Through five articles culled from 30 years of Air University Review and Airpower Journal, an as-yet-unresolved debate over the merits of weaponizing space emerges. Moving away from President Eisenhower's foundation of free space, an aerospace defense specialist during the race to the Moon advocated the deployment of advanced surveillance and tracking satellites, and implied that defensive weapons should follow. Fourteen years later, at the height of ICBM and medium-range ballistic missile escalation during the Cold War, an Air Force major cried 'Bear' and called for the immediate and overt weaponization of space. In response to similar calls -- especially to President Reagan's SDI program -- a retired Air Force officer and think-tank leader countered that space weapons were inherently destabilizing and must be avoided at all costs. Of course, the Soviet threat went away, but the space weapons enthusiasts did not -- they prophesied doom at the hands of the Chinese unless America were to rapidly develop and deploy new space capabilities. Finally, an active duty academic brought the argument back to its starting point, pointing out the excesses of the advocates' positions and suggesting pragmatic yet nonthreatening policy choices for the future.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Weaponization of Space: It Doesn't Happen in a Vacuum


    Contributors:

    Publication date :

    2000


    Size :

    8 pages


    Type of media :

    Report


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English





    Space Weaponization and US-China Relations

    K. S. Blazejewski | NTIS | 2008



    Weaponization of Space -- A Structure for Decision

    Sloboda, S. J. / Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2000