Studies of road accidents in Japan, Canada and the Federal Republic of Germany show that human perception errors and perception related misjudgements form a main causal factor in road accidents, ranging from 20% to 50%. Types of conflicts for which daytime running lights (DRL) may be beneficial, such as overtaking collisions and crossing collisions are over represented in daylight accidents. A reduction of accidents would occur if DRL could match the selective perception of traffic in darkness. Estimations of distance to other road users are shorter if DRL are used, while visibility is only partially enhanced. These perceptual results point to an explanation of the effect of DRL as based on the enhancement of timely perceptual selection and judgement, instead of based on the enhancement of mere visibility only. The expected reduction of the total number of accidents is at least 5%. The measure has surely a very good cost-benefit ratio: total costs will increase by less than 30 Dutch guilders per car per year.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Road Safety and Daytime Running Lights: A Concise Overview of the Evidence


    Contributors:

    Publication date :

    1989


    Size :

    16 pages


    Type of media :

    Report


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English




    93SF021 Daytime Running Lights: Its Safety Evidence Revisited

    Koornstra, M. J. / ISATA / ENEA; Agency: Italy | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1993




    Effects of daytime running lights on vulnerable road users

    Böhm, Michael / Köth, Karsten / Völker, Stephan et al. | Tema Archive | 2011