Key Points: The United States has an overarching national security interest in European partners that broadly share U.S. values and are willing to help foster peace and security both regionally and globally. Since the early 1990s, Finland and Sweden have transformed their security policies and defense structures in ways that improve their ability to work closely with America. Finland and Sweden plan to maintain capable (albeit smaller) militaries, reflecting lingering doubts regarding Russia and rising concerns about other security challenges. Both favor close cooperation with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NAT O), despite their official stance of 'military non- alignment.'While Finland and Sweden have not asked to join NAT O, the pros and cons of possible accession are discussed within their political and defense establishments. Finland is better positioned politically than Sweden to make a decision to seek NAT O membership, although the Finnish government is unlikely to make such a move before 2012. The situation could then evolve quickly, depending on internal political alignments and factors such as NAT O performance in Afghanistan and Russian attitudes regarding further Alliance enlargement.
Finland, Sweden, and NATO: From 'Virtual' to Formal Allies
2011
21 pages
Report
No indication
English
Behavior & Society , Political alliances , Sweden , Nato , Finland , Policies , Security , Russia , Cooperation , Afghanistan , United states , Reprints , Ussr , Foreign policy , Defense systems
How Allies Collaborate: The NATO Training Experience
NTIS | 1968
|Virtual 'bandits' target USAF training. . NATO allies show interest in unmanned K-Max
Online Contents | 2012