The national security of the United States relies on the ability to project airpower around the globe. The 2011 National Military Strategy articulates key capabilities of airpower crucial to securing U.S. national interests: the direct employment of globally integrated command and control, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and aerial strike capabilities, as well as the use of strategic and tactical airlift assets to effectuate rapid global mobility for joint forces in order to protect and advance national interests on the ground worldwide. America's airpower capabilities are unmatched; however, low-cost weapons systems with the potential to blunt U.S. aerial strike and power projection advantages have proliferated extensively among state and nonstate adversaries, threatening approach and departure corridors for these key assets. While the Services and Joint Staff have invested significant doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership, education, personnel, facilities, and policy resources to secure aircraft carriers and airfields againstpenetrating and indirect fire attacks, the lack of clear joint guidance regarding responsibilities for securing aerial approach and departure corridors creates a vulnerable seam for which no single Service or functional component has clear accountability.
Securing Aerial Approaches to Joint Airfield
2011
5 pages
Report
No indication
English
Air Transportation , Air defense , Air power , National security , Airports , United states , Integrated systems , Policies , Aircraft , Defense systems , Leadership , Employment , Skills , Low costs , Weapon systems , Airborne , Facilities , Security , Attack , Command and control systems , Joint military activities , Aircraft carriers , Landing fields , Resources , Guidance , Power , Tactical warfare , Reconnaissance , Airlift operations , Indirect fire , Doctrine , Ports(Facilities) , Accountability , Military facilities , Global , Mobility , First strike capability , Reprints