The attempt to achieve an international consensus on law of the sea is a relatively recent phenomenon. Maritime might has traditionally determined customary law of the sea. Although still significant, the unilateral actions of great maritime nations are no longer the primary factors influencing the development of customary maritime law. Historically, states claimed as much of the seas as they could. Spain, Portugal, Great Britain and the United States rose, each in its own time, to positions of preeminence as sea powers, each enforcing its own version of maritime law in the pursuit of its own national agenda. Maritime might, not general international agreement, maintained those rules as the legal regime of the day. The two World Wars of the 20th century radically altered the world order. No longer could any one nation hope to dictate what would or would not become law of the sea. States began to unilaterally claim jurisdiction over vast areas of the sea. As claims proliferated, instability increased. States sought a stable legal regime that would allow for the economic exploitation and military use of the seas. Keywords: Military publications, Periodicals, Reports. (eg)


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: Is It Time for United States Participation


    Contributors:

    Publication date :

    1990


    Size :

    45 pages


    Type of media :

    Report


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English





    United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989

    Van Bueren, G. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1998



    United Nations

    Martou, P. / Royal Aeronautical Society | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2006


    United Nations Address

    Jasentuliyana, N. / United Nations / International Astronautical Federation et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1993