This study explores a comparison of World War II wolf packs and modern attack helicopter battalions. Descriptions of submarines using continuous employment, an attack helicopter technique, against convoys in the Pacific in 1945, and U-boat commanders describing their boats as 'hovering,' offer at least a superficial relationship. This paper investigates the comparison in more depth using four battlefield mechanics: force, target, action, and counteraction. A submarine engagement sequence is developed that offers striking similarity to the way helicopters maneuver against mechanized targets. While both must close with the massed target before employing their missile systems, helicopter forces, more than their submarine 'counterparts,' emphasize long range engagements, employing weapon standoff. History, however, suggests American experience in the Pacific began to demonstrate benefits of more distance submarine engagements. Helicopter forces employ fire and maneuver, more difficult for submarines, which have only marginal speed advantage over their intended targets.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Wolf Pack Connection: A Comparison of World War II Wolf Packs and Modern Attack Helicopter Tactics


    Contributors:

    Publication date :

    1996


    Size :

    166 pages


    Type of media :

    Report


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English




    Turning the wolf into a pack.

    Online Contents | 2002



    Wolf

    Online Contents | 1995


    Wolf

    Online Contents | 1996