Low thrust electric propulsion systems are becoming sufficiently mature to consider their use as primary propulsion for orbital transfer in place of high thrust chemical systems. Instead of facing an either/or situation, it may be advantageous to use both types. This effort demonstrates a technique for finding orbital transfer strategies that use both high and low thrust propulsion systems and which result in optimal tradeoffs of the performance parameters cost of orbit insertion, total orbit transfer time, and available spacecraft mass at final orbit. These performance parameters are calculated as a function of the fraction of orbit transfer from Low Earth Orbit (LEO) to Geosynchronous Earth Orbit (GEO) provided by electric propulsion. Utility analysis is used to analyze each performance parameter and compute a total utility score for each orbit insertion strategy examined. Results from a variety of example space mission profiles yielded optimal orbit insertion strategies requiring both chemical and electric propulsion to provide a fraction of the LEO to GEO orbit transfer.
Optimal Orbit Insertion Strategies Using Combined High and Low Thrust Propulsion Systems
1997
101 pages
Report
No indication
English
Electric & Ion Propulsion , Rocket Engines & Motors , Spacecraft Trajectories & Flight Mechanics , Earth orbits , Electric propulsion , Transfer trajectories , Optimization , Low orbit trajectories , Theses , Thrust control , Space missions , Launch vehicles , Specific impulse , Geosynchronous orbits , Low earth orbits , High thrust , Low thrust , Chemical propulsion , Orbit transfer
Optimal Thrust Level for Orbit Insertion
Online Contents | 2016
|Optimal thrust level for orbit insertion
Elsevier | 2017
|De-Orbit Strategies With Low-Thrust Propulsion
Springer Verlag | 2015
|