The structural response of three full-scale helicopter rotors has been examined. Airloads predicted by CAMRAD were compared by harmonics with test measurements. Flapwise bending moments were calculated from the CAMRAD airloads using three methods: force integration, curvature, and a finite-difference method. The force-integration and curvature moments were calculated with the CAMRAD program itself; however, the finite-difference method was calculated externally by a forced response program, Blade Response to Aerodynamic Loading (BRAL). The BRAL analysis with measured airloads was shown to agree well with strain-gauge measurements on the CH-34 rotor in a wind tunnel. The CAMRAD/force-integration bending moments were shown to accumulate error as the integration progressed from tip to root. The CAMRAD/curvature moments agreed well with the finite-difference moments over most of the blade; however, at regions of rapidly changing stiffness the agreement was poor. When applied to the BRAL solution, force integration was shown to give excellent results, provided the integration had a small step size. Shear forces calculated by CAMRAD and BRAL showed fair agreement. Keywords: Aerodynamic loading; Flight loads; Rotor blades; Dynamic loads. (kt)
Examination of Helicopter Rotor Load Calculations
1988
20 pages
Report
No indication
English
Aircraft , Helicopter rotors , Aerodynamic loading , Bending moments , Blades , Computations , Curvature , Dynamic loads , Finite difference theory , Flight loads , Harmonics , Integration , Loads(Forces) , Measurement , Moments , Response , Rotor blades , Stiffness , Strain gages , Structural response , Test and evaluation , Wind tunnels
ROTOR HEAD OF HELICOPTER, MULTI-ROTOR TYPE HELICOPTER AND HELICOPTER
European Patent Office | 2017
|HELICOPTER ROTOR LOAD REDUCTION AND TIP CLEARANCE CONTROL
European Patent Office | 2020
|Helicopter rotor load reduction and tip clearance control
European Patent Office | 2016
|