Pulse combustion propulsion devices are currently being considered as alternatives to conventional constant-pressure engines. Potential advantages include reduction or elimination of pumps and/or compressors, and improved Isp for a given feed system supply pressure. In this paper the authors compare pulse combustors, or constant-volume engines, with pulse detonation engines and discuss why in some applications the former may be the preferred cycle. A model is presented for a monopropellant-fueled, constant-volume, pulse combustor which includes finite-rate processes for injection, heat release, and exhaust. The model is used to explore the time and dimensional scales of the device and to predict performance and optimal geometry. The pulsed propulsion device is found to have nearly identical specific impulse as the steady-state engine operating with the same mass flow and throat area, and the nozzle optimizes at the same area ratio. Pulsed combustor behavior is found to depend on two time scales: the ratio of the heat release time to the chamber blowdown time, and the ratio of the blowdown time to the injector pulsing period. The authors briefly consider the application of pulse combustion devices in pressure-fed satellite propulsion systems and examine their effect on satellite mission.
Pulse Combustion Rockets for Space Propulsion Applications
2002
3 pages
Report
No indication
English
Combustion & Ignition , Rocket Engines & Motors , Astronautics , Steady state , Pulse generators , Combustors , Liquid propellant rocket engines , Rocket propulsion , Space propulsion , Symposia , Models , Comparison , Artificial satellites , Specific impulse , Blowdown , Pulse combustors , Constant volume engines , Pulse detonation engines , Satellite propulsion , Comparative studies
Pulse Combustion Rockets for Space Propulsion Applications
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2003
|Rockets for aircraft propulsion
Engineering Index Backfile | 1951
|Antimatter rockets and interstellar propulsion
AIAA | 1993
|