An appraisal was made of advanced portable and emergency life support systems concepts for space station, space shuttle, lunar base, and Mars EVA missions. Specifications are given, and the methodology is described. Subsystem studies and systems integration efforts are summarized. Among the conclusions are the following: (1) For long duration missions, a configuration incorporating a regenerable CO2 control subsystem and a thermal control subsystem utilizing a minimum of expendables decreases the vehicle penalty of present configurations. (2) For shorter duration missions, a configuration incorporating an expendale water thermal control subsystem is the most competitive subsystem; regenerable CO2 control subsystems if properly developed are competitive with nonregenerable counterparts. (3) The CO2 reduction and oxygen reclamation withing the parent vehicle is only competitive when there are three or more parent vehicle resupply periods. (4) For long duration emergency systems of one hour or more, inherent redundancy within the primary configuration to provide emergency thermal control is the most competitive approach. (Author)
Advanced Extravehicular Protective Systems Study, Volume 1
1972
104 pages
Report
No indication
English
Advanced Extravehicular Protective Systems
AIAA | 1972
|Advanced extravehicular protective systems
NTRS | 1972
|Advanced Extravehicular Protective System (AEPS) study
NTRS | 1972
|Advanced Extravehicular Protective System (Aeps) Study
NTIS | 1972
|