By means of a field test on new concrete pavement in a snow-free area, an evaluation was made of various pavement marking materials including reflectorized and unreflectorized raised buttons, hot-applied thermoplastics and standard paint. Evaluations included relative long-term costs, durability, wet and dry visibility, driver preference and traffic safety. The study concluded that raised markers were superior to standard paint in terms of durability driver preference and night visibility under wet conditions. Projected over a 10 year period, the initial and replacement costs of raised buttons was estimated to be compatible with that of paints. Accident data was insufficient and inconclusive with respect to the merits of the various markings. No conclusions were reached regarding comparative thermoplastic markings. (BPR abstract)


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Semi-Permanent Traffic Striping


    Contributors:
    L. W. Cody (author)

    Publication date :

    1967


    Size :

    32 pages


    Type of media :

    Report


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English




    Traffic striping in California

    Smith, W.A. | Engineering Index Backfile | 1935


    New machine speeds traffic striping

    Engineering Index Backfile | 1931


    Roadway Striping as a Traffic Calming Option

    Kahn, Robert | Online Contents | 2011


    Waterborne Striping at Adot

    British Library Online Contents | 1993


    Ohio pavement striping equipment

    Neal, H.E. | Engineering Index Backfile | 1949