Knowing that the APU is the most expensive support device, the temptation is strong to entirely remove it from commercial transports. Adverse consequences of such action include: Loss of the APU puts the burden on the ground equipment, of which the maintenance at the line stations sometimes leaves much to be desired; For some stations the removal of the APU could require a sizeable investment of ground support equipment; Loss of ability to start engine during or after push-back; Increased engine operating time at the gate; Engines have to be kept running after arrival until ground equipment is hooked up; and The risk of deficient comfort for passengers at certain stations in hot or cold weather. The author concludes that KLM cannot permit the removal of the APU since this is the only device that provides prompt and reliable service, independent of other facilities.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    APU (Auxiliary Power Unit) in Commercial Airline Operation


    Contributors:

    Publication date :

    1983


    Size :

    9 pages


    Type of media :

    Report


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English




    INTERNET CONNECTED AUXILIARY POWER UNIT AIRLINE MAINTENANCE SYSTEM

    LI QIXIANG / GRIFFITH TIMOTHY / SHAH SAPAN N | European Patent Office | 2023

    Free access

    INTERNET CONNECTED AUXILIARY POWER UNIT AIRLINE MAINTENANCE SYSTEM

    LI QIXIANG / GRIFFITH TIMOTHY / SHAH SAPAN N | European Patent Office | 2021

    Free access

    Internet connected auxiliary power unit airline maintenance system

    LI QIXIANG / GRIFFITH TIMOTHY / SHAH SAPAN N | European Patent Office | 2022

    Free access


    Commercial airline scheduling technique

    Hyman, W. / Gordon, L. | Engineering Index Backfile | 1968