Within days of a major failed strike by attack helicopters during Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) analysts were questioning the value of such platforms on the modern battlefield. As OIF moved from combat to stability operations, helicopter losses from enemy action actually increased seemingly strengthening the argument of those who see the helicopter as suitable to some combat operations. Attack helicopter operations have diverged into two distinct categories, interdiction and close air support (CAS), since their inception. This thesis argues that attack helicopters are most suited to perform CAS while their employment in interdiction is problematic at best. Doctrine, tactics, and threat are studied as they applied in the Soviet-Afghan War, Desert Storm, and OIF in order to examine the issue across a range of time and types of warfare.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    CAS, Interdiction, and Attack Helicopters


    Contributors:

    Publication date :

    2005


    Size :

    79 pages


    Type of media :

    Report


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English




    US attack helicopters

    Online Contents | 2003



    Attack helicopters on the march

    Richardson, D. | British Library Online Contents | 1992