By way of a summary, let me restate as follows: (1) I consider operations research a science, but an inexact one. (2) The operations analyst, as opposed to the pure scientist, emphasizes control rather than understanding. (3) The use of judgment in constructing and applying operations-analytical models in inescapable. (4) Since the use of judgment is a sine-qua-non, such judgment should be as expert and its application as systematic as possible. (5) It would be in the interest of raising the scientific standards of operations research to seek improved methods of identifying and measuring expertness and of employing experts efficiently both solitarily and in groups. (6) In particular, the utilization of groups of experts by consensus techniques, by the Delphi technique, by simulation procedures and operational gaming, should be further refined to the point where they will be generally acceptable as part of the stock-in-trade of operations research. (Author)


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    The Systematic Use of Expert Judgment in Operations Research


    Contributors:
    O. Helmer (author)

    Publication date :

    1963


    Size :

    10 pages


    Type of media :

    Report


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English





    Eliciting and Analyzing Expert Judgment: A Practical Guide

    M. A. Meyer / J. M. Booker | NTIS | 1990


    Examining the Effect of Information Order on Expert Judgment

    Adelman, Leonard | Online Contents | 1993


    The Importance of the Task in Analyzing Expert Judgment

    Stewart, Thomas R. | Online Contents | 1997


    Improving Concordance of Expert Judgment in Formal Safety Assessment

    Cai, Y. / Liu, Z. / Kobayashi, E. | British Library Online Contents | 2011