In recent years, the Congress has shown interest in powering some of the Navy s future destroyers and amphibious warfare ships with nuclear rather than conventional (petroleum-based) fuel. At the request of the former Chairman of the Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces of the House Committee on Armed Services, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has estimated the difference in life-cycle costs (the total costs incurred for a ship, from acquisition through operations to disposal) between powering those new surface ships with nuclear reactors and equipping them with conventional engines.
Cost-Effectiveness of Nuclear Power for Navy Surface Ships
2011
29 pages
Report
No indication
English
Business & Economics , Marine Engineering , Combustion & Ignition , Cost effectiveness , Life cycle costs , Naval vessels , Nuclear powered ships , Cost estimates , Crude oil , Military forces(United states) , Cbo reports , Navy surface ships , Oil prices , Present-value calculations , Alternative discount rates
Cost Estimating Relationships for U.S. Navy Ships
NTIS | 1983
|Power Transmission Couplings Aboard Navy Ships
Automotive engineering | 1980
|