To maximize effectiveness, theater missile defense (TMD) should include counterforce options, active defenses and passive defenses. During the Gulf War, however, the integration of these three elements occurred on an ad hoc basis. To increase the political, strategic and tactical effectiveness of existing defensive systems in wartime, Army planners should integrate the three elements of TMD into an overall strategy. This report describes how the philosophy that influenced antisubmarine warfare operations can be used to guide counterforce attacks against mobile missiles, thereby improving theater missile defenses. It explains why an ASW approach to counterforce is superior to just attacking an opponent's missile infrastructure. It also explains why this type of counterforce strategy can be based on preemption not preventive war. The impact of ASW counterforce operations are also evaluated in terms of the stability/instability paradox, crisis stability, alliance relations and deterrence.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Counterforce and Theater Missile Defense: Can the Army Use an ASW Approach to the SCUD Hunt


    Contributors:
    J. J. Wirtz (author)

    Publication date :

    1995


    Size :

    21 pages


    Type of media :

    Report


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English