Currently, the Air Force launches military satellites on expendable launch vehicles to low earth orbit (LEO), and with the use of a chemical upper stage or an apogee kick motor, moves the satellite to a higher orbit. This launch procedure is extremely costly because it requires additional launch preparations, technology considerations, equipment, and fuel. Also, the additional mass of the chemical upper stage causes a larger, and thus more expensive, launch vehicle to be required. An economical alternative is to utilize reusable launch vehicles (RLVs) and reusable orbital launch vehicles (ROTVs). This concept could possibly achieve even greater savings if satellites were dual manifested on the launch vehicles. This thesis determines - by varying mass capacity of RLVs, the cost per kg of RLV mass capacity, and the satellite cost per kg - when, within a given scenario, the savings of dual manifesting is at least ten percent of the cost of single manifesting by developing a dual manifesting algorithm and simulation to analyze possible savings.
Determining the Economic Plausibility of Dual Manifesting Reusable Launch Vehicles and Reusable Orbital Transfer Vehicles for the Replenishment of Military Satellites
1997
89 pages
Report
No indication
English
Unmanned Spacecraft , Space Launch Vehicles & Support Equipment , Earth orbits , Military satellites , Launch vehicles , Algorithms , Computerized simulation , Simulation , Air force , Cost effectiveness , Low orbit trajectories , Cost analysis , Capacity(Quantity) , Mass , Theses , Fuels , Launching , Reusable equipment , Expendable , Replenishment , Apogee , Reusable launch vehicles
Engineering Index Backfile | 1964
|Elsevier | 1985
|Reusable Launch Vehicles Outlook - Launch Vehicles Table
Online Contents | 2009
Future reusable launch vehicles
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002
|Reusable Launch Vehicles Outlook
Online Contents | 2002