This is the third report in the series concerning Overground Excess Attenuation, ESA. Different models and algorithms for computing ESA are compared in terms of differences in A-levels at varying distances for different aircraft noise spectra. ESA values from recent field measurement at Wright-Patterson AFB, Dayton OH, theoretical models, and from NOISEMAP and a SAE recommendation are compared. It is recommended that the current NOISEMAP ESA algorithms be replaced with ESA curves based on Dayton data acquired under moderate downwind propagation conditions. It is also recommended that additional ESA field data be acquired over irregular terrain where direct line-of-sight propagation does not exist.
Overground Excess Sound Attenuation (ESA). Volume 3. Application of ESA Data in Noisefile
1985
57 pages
Report
No indication
English
Acoustics , Noise Pollution & Control , Aircraft , Aircraft noise , Acoustic attenuation , Noise , Spectra , Attenuation , Line of sight , Propagation , Sound , Terrain , Measurement , Structural properties , Vertical orientation , Algorithms , Communities , Exposure(General) , Wind direction , Sound transmission , Models , Theory , Visibility , Mathematical models , Computerized simulation , Acoustic data , Modification , ESA(Excess Sound Attenuation) , Noisemap computer program
SLUB | 2012
|Underground and overground trains
SLUB | 2017
|On the excess attenuation of sound in the atmosphere
TIBKAT | 1975
|IuD Bahn | 2012
|Excess attenuation of sound due to the atmospheric influence on sound propagation
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2004
|