The optimization of multi objective problems is currently an area of important research and development. The importance of type of problems has allowed the development of multiple metaheuristics for their solution. To determine which multi objective metaheuristic has the best performance with respect to a problem, in this article an experimental comparison between two of them: Sorting Genetic Algorithm No dominated-II (NSGA-II) and Multi Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPS) using ZDT test functions is made. The results obtained by both algorithms are compared and analyzed based on different performance metrics that evaluate both the dispersion of the solutions on the Pareto front, and its proximity to it.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    An Experimental Comparison of Multiobjective Algorithms: NSGA-II and OMOPSO




    Publication date :

    2010-09-01


    Size :

    352562 byte




    Type of media :

    Conference paper


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English



    Multiobjective Optimization design of high frequency transformer based on NSGA-II algorithm

    Wang, Chunjie / Han, Wenkai / Chen, Peng et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2022



    Tuning of Two-Degrees-of-Freedom PID Controllers via the Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm NSGA-II

    Lagunas-Jimenez, Ruben / Fernandez-Anaya, Guillermo / Martinez-garcia, J. | IEEE | 2006


    Comparison between Multiobjective Population-Based Algorithms in Mechanical Problem

    Radhi, H.E. / Barrans, S.M. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2012


    NSGA-III_01.json

    Zorn, Max Benjamin / Claus, Luisa / Frenzel, Christian et al. | DataCite | 2024