This paper presents a comparative analysis of conventional switched reluctance machines (SRMs) and mutually coupled switched reluctance machines (MCSRMs) in terms of inductance profiles, torque profiles, the average torque, and the maximum torque. Four 3-phase, 12/8 SRMs including the conventional SRM, the short-pitched MCSRM, the fractionally-pitched MCSRM, and the fully-pitched MCSRM are evaluated. Compared to the conventional SRM, the MCSRMs can be driven by the three-phase standard voltage source converter and work in bipolar, two-phase excitation mode. In the bipolar, two-phase excitation mode, the fully-pitched MCSRM has the highest maximum and average torque production compared to the short-pitched MCSRM and the fractionally-pitched MCSRM.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Comparative analysis of conventional switched reluctance machines and mutually coupled switched reluctance machines


    Contributors:
    Hensley, Forest (author) / Wong, Aik Wah (author) / Wei Chung Yu, (author) / Ye, Jin (author)


    Publication date :

    2017-06-01


    Size :

    1601338 byte




    Type of media :

    Conference paper


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English



    Reluctance Mesh-Based Modeling of Switched Reluctance Machines

    Watthewaduge, Gayan / Sayed, Ehab / Emadi, Ali et al. | IEEE | 2021




    Eddy currents in windings of switched reluctance machines

    Carstensen, Christian | TIBKAT | 2007

    Free access

    Time-Efficient Behavioral Modeling of Switched Reluctance Machines

    Jin, Zichao / Zhang, Ziyan / Chen, Chengxiu et al. | IEEE | 2021