In this paper three image quality metrics are compared: mean-square error (MSE), noise quality measure (NQM), and structural information metric (SIM). Such a comparison is made in order to evaluate the performance of those different metrics under practical conditions. Experimental results along with statistical indices of performance are provided. The referred results suggest that there are situations in which the MSE-based metric outperforms the two other considered metrics.
A comparison of image quality metric performances under practical conditions
IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005 ; 3 ; III-1192
2005-01-01
251787 byte
Conference paper
Electronic Resource
English
A Comparison of Image Quality Metric Performances Under Practical Conditions
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2005
|MTF provides an image-quality metric
British Library Online Contents | 2005
Automotive Evaporator Performances Under Different Humidity Conditions
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2004
|Automotive evaporator performances under different humidity conditions
Automotive engineering | 2004
|Automotive Evaporator Performances Under Different Humidity Conditions
SAE Technical Papers | 2004
|