The camera mapping can be seen in two ways. The classic approach is to emphasize the projective nature of the camera. But also every point in the image plane determines a viewing ray by its re-projection. Both mappings can be described by the same set of parameters. In fact the re-projective camera mapping can be seen as the inversion of the projective camera mapping. In this article we compare two error functions for a camera calibration. The projective error function measures the distance of the projected prototype to the observed points in the image plane. The re-projective error function measures the distance of the prototype to the reprojected rays which are determined by the observed points. We present calibration algorithms for both error functions and compare them with regard to the 3D-reconstruction problem.
Re-projective vs. projective camera calibration: effects on 3D-reconstruction
IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005 ; 2 ; II-1170
2005-01-01
107352 byte
Conference paper
Electronic Resource
English
Re-Projective vs. Projective Camera Calibration: Effects on 3D-Reconstruction
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2005
|Plane-based projective reconstruction
IEEE | 2001
|Plane-Based Projective Reconstruction
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2001
|Untwisting a Projective Reconstruction
British Library Online Contents | 2004
|A Generalized Projective Reconstruction Theorem and Depth Constraints for Projective Factorization
British Library Online Contents | 2015
|