Classical radars use deterministic waveforms, such as linear frequency modulated pulses. Noise radars, on the other hand, use random waveforms, or waveforms that resemble random signals. The randomness of the signal provides certain advantages, such as limiting or avoiding range/velocity measurement ambiguity, or better resistance to jamming. This, however, comes at a price of more complicated system architecture and reduced detection range. In this article a comparison of classical deterministic waveform radars and their noise versions is carried out, showing their similarities and differences.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Noise vs. Deterministic Waveform Radar—Possibilities and Limitations


    Contributors:


    Publication date :

    2020-10-01


    Size :

    9042893 byte




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English



    Coherent radar FM noise limitations

    Gillespie, N. R. / Raduziner, D. M. | NTRS | 1965


    Hydrofoil -- Possibilities and limitations

    Hook, C. | Engineering Index Backfile | 1966


    STOL -- Some possibilities and limitations

    Mair, W.A. | Engineering Index Backfile | 1966


    Styling possibilities and technical limitations

    British Library Online Contents | 1997


    Phase measurement accuracy in noise waveform synthetic aperture radar

    Lukin, Kostyantyn A. / Vyplavin, Pavlo L. / Palamarchuk, Vladimir P. et al. | IEEE | 2015