This correspondence is a response to Comments on the above article raised by Wen et al. (2023). The authors in Wen et al. (2023) insist that there might be some errors in the Kalman filter derivation procedure, mathematical expression, and computability of high-order error terms in Ko et al. (2022). However, the arguments are not always true. The authors in Wen et al. (2023) misunderstood the derivation of the Kalman filter by the assumption of an unbiased estimator. In addition, they also misunderstood the assumption of noise distribution for the Kalman filter design. In this correspondence, we analyze and refute the comments in a pointby-point fashion.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Response to “Comments on ‘High-Speed Train Positioning Using Deep Kalman Filter With 5G NR Signals”’


    Contributors:
    Ko, Kyeongjun (author) / Byun, Ilmu (author) / Ahn, Woojin (author) / Shin, Wonjae (author)


    Publication date :

    2024-02-01


    Size :

    305057 byte




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English




    High-Speed Train Positioning Using Deep Kalman Filter With 5G NR Signals

    Ko, Kyeongjun / Byun, Ilmu / Ahn, Woojin et al. | IEEE | 2022



    A Strong Wind Warning Method for High Speed Train Using Kalman Filter

    Li, Yuntao / Huang, Hong / Wang, Hongye et al. | IEEE | 2012


    High speed train optimal adhesion control method based on a Cubature Kalman filter

    Tang, Jieping / Balogun Alanamu, Bolaji / Wang, Song et al. | SPIE | 2024