The new Air Traffic Management concepts rely on high-precision 4-D trajectories, the predictability of which will greatly improve and result in an increase of the efficiency of decision aid tools. This will result in a reduction of air traffic controllers’ workload through fewer interventions. However, a residual number of conflicts will remain to be managed by controllers. It would be interesting to select, each time it is possible, the conflicts to be handled by the controller rather than by the automated system. On the basis of previous studies, different traffic configurations and resolution types were identified. These were validated using a traffic sample. This validation should be considered preliminary one, due to the traffic data used (27 hours), insufficient compared to the possible sources of variation in relation to the resolution process and workload. However, the results already show some interesting information on how to allocate conflict solving in a future context, when both human and machine will share the task of solving conflicts. This may already contribute to better prioritize in conflict solving, but is mainly a plea for a comprehensive work on this question.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Elements for prioritizing between conflict resolutions in air traffic control


    Contributors:


    Publication date :

    2008-10-01


    Size :

    514427 byte




    Type of media :

    Conference paper


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English




    Environmentally-Optimized Air Traffic Conflict Resolutions

    Visser, H. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007


    An Interactive Conflict Solver for Learning Air Traffic Conflict Resolutions

    Tran, Phu N. / Pham, Duc-Thinh / Goh, Sim Kuan et al. | AIAA | 2020


    Required Ranges for Conflict Resolutions in Air Traffic Management

    Vincent H. Kuo / Yiyuan J. Zhao | AIAA | 2001