This paper identifies potential drivers and individuals’ willingness to pay (WTP) for offsetting their emissions from traveling. We focus on the effects of framing the polluting activity with different modes of transportation (i.e. bus and plane) and travel occasions (i.e. holiday and professional training) as well as the effects of contributions from the travel provider. The analyses are based on discrete choice experiments with a representative sample of about 1000 consumers from Germany. Applying mixed logit and latent class logit models, the findings suggest substantial framing effects resulting from the variation in the mode of transportation as well as a significantly higher WTP when offsets are matched by the travel provider 1:1. The findings further indicate that re-/afforestation projects in the participants’ region are the preferred mode for compensation. Respondents who are more willing to offset emissions from traveling seem to be younger and female, have a higher income, exhibit stronger environmental and social preferences, and believe that offsetting is effective in protecting the climate.


    Access

    Download


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Consumers’ willingness to offset their CO2 emissions from traveling: A discrete choice analysis of framing and provider contributions



    Publication date :

    2017


    Type of media :

    Report


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English






    Does hedonic framing improve people’s willingness-to-pay for vehicle greenhouse gas emissions?

    Wang, Bobin / Waygood, E.O.D. / Daziano, Ricardo A. et al. | Elsevier | 2021


    Estimating willingness-to-pay from discrete choice models: Setting the record straight

    Daly, Andrew / Hess, Stephane / Ortúzar, Juan de Dios | Elsevier | 2023


    Willingness to pay for car safety: sensitivity to time framing

    Andersson, H. / Hammitt, J. / Lindberg, G. et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2009