Highlights We studied the effectiveness of intensive driving courses (IDCs). IDC drivers reported an incident more often than traditional educated drivers. There was no difference in the number of attempts to pass the driving test. No evidence for a self-selection bias was found.
Abstract This paper studies the effectiveness of intensive driving courses; both in driving test success and safe driving after passing the driving test. The so-called intensive driving course (IDC) consists of a limited number of consecutive days in which the learner driver takes driving lessons all day long; and is different from traditional training in which lessons are spread out over several months and in which learners take one or two driving lessons of approximately 1h each per week. Our study indicates that – in the first two years of their driving career – IDC drivers (n =35) reported an incident significantly more often (43%) than 351 drivers who obtained their driving licence after traditional training (26%). Our study also indicates that the IDC drivers underwent almost the same number of training hours as the drivers who had traditional training, although spacing of these hours was different. There was no difference in the number of attempts to pass the driving test. We did not find any evidence that a self-selection bias was responsible for the difference in reported number of incidents.
Young drivers who obtained their licence after an intensive driving course report more incidents than drivers with a traditional driver education
Accident Analysis and Prevention ; 58 ; 64-69
2013-03-31
6 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Licence suspended until all drivers complete Driver CPC training.
Online Contents | 2012
Car drivers' willingness to pay for not losing their driving licence
Online Contents | 2002
|