Abstract Economic theory would define airport security as a public good; no different than border control or the military, but this is not how it is treated in many countries. In Mexico, airport security is financed entirely from the public treasury. In the U.S., the cost is split evenly between air passengers and the public treasury. In Canada, air passengers pay the entire cost of airport security. The Canadian case is examined in detail. Forcing air passengers to bear the full cost of airport security creates a number of economic distortions. Air travel in Canada is discouraged by the added cost of security, but worse it encourages travelers to cross the Canada-U.S. border where they can fly from lower cost U.S. airports. The tax losses to the public treasury because of this policy are arguably greater than the total security fees collected. Airport security evolved organically rather than by design because governments were forced to react quickly to escalating threats. As a result, a “user-pay” financing system was put in place in Canada without careful policy analysis.
Highlights Development path of airport security funding in Canada. Economic case for treating airport security as a public good. Comparison of airport security funding in Mexico, Canada and the U.S. Analysis of the economic distortions caused by current passenger-funded airport security.
Canadian airport security: The privatization of a public good
Journal of Air Transport Management ; 48 ; 52-59
2015-01-01
8 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Airport privatization : aspects, issues, and challenges
SLUB | 2015
|Two-sided platforms in airport privatization
Elsevier | 2016
|Two-sided platforms in airport privatization
Online Contents | 2016
|Potential for Privatization: Halifax International Airport
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994
|The privatization of Canadian National
British Library Online Contents | 1997
|