HighlightsTeens practiced for an average of 46.6 hours, but less than half completed the required the GDL requirement of 45 hours in Virginia, USA.Exposure to diverse road types increased over time, and driving errors decreased suggesting that manual and judgment skills improved with practice.Parental instruction was primarily focused on the immediate demands of driving.2.6% of trips did not have an adult in the front seat, and teens drove in a riskier way during these trips.High risk secondary task engagement increased twofold over the course of practice driving.
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics and progression of practice driving during the learner license period in a sample of teenagers. During the first and last 10h of practice driving, we examined (1) the amount, variety and complexity of conditions of practice; (2) the nature of parental instruction; and (3) errors that teens made while driving. Data were collected from 90 teens and 131 parents living in Virginia, USA, using in-vehicle cameras, audio recorders, GPS and trip recorders. Based on data collected from the instrumented vehicles, teens practiced for 46.6h on average, slightly higher than the GDL requirement for their jurisdiction, though half did not complete the required 45h of practice and only 17% completed the required 15h of night time driving. Exposure to diverse roadways increased over the practice driving period, which averaged 10.6 months. Most driving instruction occurred in reaction to specific driving situations, such as navigating and identifying hazards, and could be characterized as co-driving. Higher order instruction, which relates to the tactics or strategies for safe driving, was less frequent, but remained stable through the practice driving period. Instruction of all forms was more likely following an elevated gravitational force (g-force) event. Errors decreased over time, suggesting improvements in manual and judgment skills, but engagement in potentially distracting secondary tasks increased (when an adult was in the vehicle). A small percentage of trips occurred with no passenger in the front seat, and the g-force rate during these trips was almost 5 times higher than trips with an adult front-seat passenger. Taken collectively, these findings indicate (1) most teens got at least the required amount of supervised practice, but some did not; (2) instruction was mainly reactive and included some higher order instruction; (3) teens driving skills improved despite increased exposure to complex driving conditions, but secondary tasks also increased. Opportunities remained for improving the quality and variability in supervision and enhancing the development of skills during the lengthy period of practice.
Naturalistic assessment of the learner license period
Accident Analysis and Prevention ; 106 ; 275-284
2017-06-18
10 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Learner , Practice driving , Novice , Teenage
Transportation Research Record | 2020
|Naturalistic assessment of novice teenage crash experience
Elsevier | 2011
|The effect of the learner license Graduated Driver Licensing components on teen drivers’ crashes
Online Contents | 2013
|Individual driver risk assessment using naturalistic driving data
Online Contents | 2013
|