Highlights Considering road-related variables (i.e., design speed, circular curve radius), LiDAR technical parameters (e.g., angle resolution, mounting height), and point threshold for detection, the available sight distance at as-built horizontal curved roads for LiDAR-based automated vehicles were investigated through virtual simulations. Maximum speeds against inadequate sight distances for LiDAR-based automated vehicles were derived and speed limits for specific curved geometry conditions were proposed. A larger radius or design speed, fewer LiDAR channels, or a higher point threshold for detection cause a shorter available sight distance. Level 3 LiDAR-based automated vehicles struggle to adapt to as-built horizontal curved roads, and level 4 or 5 automated vehicles cannot assure adequate available sight distances on high-type curved roads.
Abstract Emerging automated vehicle (AV) technology is being deployed on as-built roadways due to its promising safety improvements. However, realistic problems concerning whether and how perception sensor-based AVs can safely adapt to the existing roadway infrastructures remain to be well addressed due to a lack of consideration of the sensor's angular resolution and detection threshold. In this study, we aim to assess whether LiDAR-based AVs (LAVs) could safely adapt to as-built horizontal curved roads from the perspective of available sight distances (ASDs) through virtual simulations. In specific, i) numerous driving scenarios featuring the design speed (V d: 40 ∼ 100 km/h), circular curve radius (R: limited minimum radius ∼ common minimum radius), LAV (with LiDAR technical parameters, e.g., number of channels, N c: 32, 64, 128), and the front target vehicle were simulated in PreScan/MATLAB/Simulink co-simulation platform; ii) an ASD extraction algorithm was proposed considering the point threshold for detection (N T); iii) effects of V d, R, N c, and N T on the ASD were analyzed and polynomial models were adopted to capture relationships between the ASD, V d, R at different N c and N T; iv) the minimum speed against as-built sight obstructions along the roadside and the maximum speed against inadequate sight distance were proposed by comparing the ASD with the required stopping sight distance of human-driven vehicles and LAVs (level 3 ∼ 5), respectively; and v) speed limits (V L) against inadequate sight distances for level 3 ∼ 5 LAVs were proposed. The results indicate that: i) a larger R or V d, fewer N c, or a higher N T would cause a shorter ASD in general; ii) attention should be paid to the occlusion imposed by as-built roadside infrastructures even with more N c or/and a lower N T, particularly to curved roads with more rigorous geometric design controls (e.g., small V d); and iii) level 3 LAVs struggle to adapt to as-built horizontal curved roads, and level 4 or 5 LAVs cannot assure adequate ASDs on high-type curved roads (e.g., large V d). These findings shall help road administrators make decisions on speed limits for LAVs on as-built curved roads.
Readiness of as-built horizontal curved roads for LiDAR-based automated vehicles: A virtual simulation analysis
2022-06-23
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Safer roads with automated vehicles?
TIBKAT | 2018
|NTIS | 1972
Ready to bully automated vehicles on public roads?
Elsevier | 2020
|