Abstract Studies on airport performance have focused primarily on productivity and operational efficiency. There are very few studies on airports’ financial viability and strength, especially those in the United States. Most of the U.S. commercial service airports are government-owned entities and operated for the service of the community rather than for profit, but expected to be financially self-sufficient and raise capital funds mainly through the bond markets. However, past studies of the financial performance of U.S. airports have relied on traditional profitability measures and financial efficiency measures that are more appropriate for airports owned and operated by for-profit entities. Based on the literature for non-profit organizations and the practices of credit rating agencies and government oversight bodies, this paper adopts six pertinent financial performance metrics to measure and compare the operational financial performance, leverage, and liquidity of 60 large and medium commercial service airports in the United States during the 2010–2017 period. The paper further examines factors that may affect airport financial performance. The results reveal that large hub airports have better liquidity while medium airports have better leverage during the study period. These results suggest that the effect of airport size on financial performance is inconclusive. Regression analysis shows that airports with high productive efficiency and those without a dominant carrier tend to have more surplus revenues for meeting their operational financial needs and capital spending and have better liquidity. The paper highlights the importance of using appropriate metrics to evaluate the financial performance of public sector entities and provides relevant information to bond investors. The devastating impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on airports accentuate the significance of leverage and liquidity. Therefore, the financial metrics discussed in this paper would help support public policy debates and allocate public funds to the airports.

    Highlights Discusses financial performance metrics of large and medium commercial service airports in the U.S. for the 2010–2017 period. Financial ratio analysis reveals that large hub airports have stronger liquidity while medium airports have better leverage. Analysis puts focus on the appropriate financial metrics for U.S. airports relevant to policy makers and investors.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Evaluating financial performance of commercial service airports in the United States


    Contributors:


    Publication date :

    2021-07-07




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English




    Social Media and Primary Commercial Service Airports

    Lee Stambaugh, Clayton | Online Contents | 2013


    Social Media and Primary Commercial Service Airports

    Stambaugh, Clayton Lee | Transportation Research Record | 2013


    Evaluating the performance of Chinese airports

    Chang, Yu-Chun / Yu, Ming-Miin / Chen, Po-Chi | Elsevier | 2012


    Evaluating the performance of Chinese airports

    Chang, Y. C. | Online Contents | 2013


    Impact of Size and Ownership on the Financial Performance of European Commercial Airports

    Giovanelli, Lucia / Rotondo, Federico / Raghavan, Sunder | Transportation Research Record | 2023