AbstractProblem: This study evaluated common scaffold safety practices in construction. Method: A 150-point checklist was used to evaluate supported scaffold safety practices at 113 scaffolds in nine areas of the eastern United States. Results: Thirty-six scaffolds (31.9%) were either in danger of collapse or missing planking, guardrails, or adequate access. There was a strong statistical correlation between structural flaws and fall protection hazards, and between proper scaffold safety practice and (a) competent persons with scaffold safety training, (b) use of separate scaffold erection contractors, and (c) scaffolds that were not simple frame types. A slightly weaker correlation was found with union status of the scaffold erector, and no correlation was found with geography, site size, number of scaffold users, and trade working on the scaffold. Discussion: Recommendations are made for safer scaffold practice, including a simple four-factor scaffold inspection method. Impact on industry: Implementation of the four-factor method could result in a cost-effective way to identify unsafe scaffolds.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    An evaluation of scaffold safety at construction sites


    Contributors:

    Published in:

    Journal of Safety Research ; 35 , 2 ; 141-150


    Publication date :

    2003-11-19


    Size :

    10 pages




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English




    An evaluation of scaffold safety at construction sites

    Halperin, Kopl M. | Online Contents | 2004


    Prospective safety performance evaluation on construction sites

    Wu, Xianguo / Liu, Qian / Zhang, Limao et al. | Elsevier | 2015


    SAFETY SCAFFOLD STRUCTURE FOR CONSTRUCTION LIFT

    CHOI DUCK HWAN | European Patent Office | 2016

    Free access


    Train safety scaffold

    European Patent Office | 2017

    Free access