Highlights ► If no pavement or pedestrian lane is available, it is much safer to walk facing traffic. ► Pedestrians walking against traffic cut their average injury risk by 77%. ► The effect of facing traffic is higher for main roads than secondary roads.
Abstract This study was designed to evaluate the potential safety importance of the walking direction along a road by examining pedestrian accidents as a function of exposure to risk. The study was limited to rural two-lane roads with no pavement or pedestrian lane. The accident data included police-reported road accidents from Finland between 2006 and 2010 in which a motorized vehicle had struck a pedestrian walking along the road. There were 18 accidents involving a fatally injured pedestrian and 87 accidents involving a non-fatally injured pedestrian. The exposure data collected from the roughly 3400km included 258 pedestrians. The main finding was that the mean effect of facing traffic compared to walking with traffic was a 77% decrease in fatal and in non-fatal injury pedestrian accidents. The results further showed that the effects were greater for main roads than for secondary roads. The main implication of this study is that information about the importance of facing traffic should be reinforced with specific information about its substantial safety benefits.
Does facing traffic improve pedestrian safety?
Accident Analysis and Prevention ; 50 ; 1207-1210
2012-09-11
4 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Does facing traffic improve pedestrian safety?
Online Contents | 2013
|The way to improve safety of pedestrian traffic at unregulated pedestrian crossing
DOAJ | 2021
|Automated traffic control for pedestrian safety
IEEE | 2017
|Does Separating Trucks from Other Traffic Improve Overall Safety?
Transportation Research Record | 2005
|