New Haven favors constructive station; other roads oppose it but some would retain trucks for other service; New Haven may do its own trucking; Port Authority not sufficiently concerned over savings to railroads; P.R.R. wishes to retain inland stations and lighterage trucking; presence of loaders on piers again questioned; Erie hopes to divert constructive station business to its piers; trucking contractors and Port Authority favor retention; two different plans for delivery of freight in New York proposed as substitutes for trucking operations of railway contract truckmen; railway group preferred as universal station operator; trucking in lieu of lighterage available on demand; merchants oppose loading charge; terminals losing business to trucks; United States admits by-passing inland station. (See also - no. 22 June 2 pp. 1286-1290, no. 23 June 9 pp. 1339-1341)
Hearing on trucking in New York
Ry. Age
Railway Age ; 84 , n 24
1928
4 pages
Article (Journal)
English
© Metadata Copyright Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
I. C. C. favors trucking in New York
Engineering Index Backfile | 1929
Motor delivery and trucking in New York city
Engineering Index Backfile | 1902
|I. C. C. Probes New York rail-trucking contracts
Engineering Index Backfile | 1928
|Horse trucking versus motor trucking, Arthur
Engineering Index Backfile | 1926
|Online Contents | 2013