Optimism bias has been a considerable challenge in the planning and delivery of public services, particularly infrastructure mega projects.  This has resulted in consistently underestimated costs and overestimated benefits, as well as delivery delays.  This paper explores whether innovative mechanisms of collecting and publicly disseminating information about the performance of government contractors on past projects can contribute to improving the success rate of future initiatives.  Drawing on international examples from North America, Europe and Asia, it is found that the production and dissemination of greater information through benchmarking does not on its own lead to reductions in the prevalence of optimism biases.  However, there is evidence that when combined with incentives built formally into government procurement processes that reward strong past performance, benchmarking can support improvements in the quality of project outputs.


    Access

    Download


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Managing Optimism Biases in the Delivery of Large-Infrastructure Projects: A Corporate Performance Benchmarking Approach


    Contributors:


    Publication date :

    2010




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    Unknown




    Biases in social comparisons: Optimism or pessimism?

    Menon, Geeta | Online Contents | 2009


    Biases in social comparisons: Optimism or pessimism?

    Menon, Geeta | Online Contents | 2009


    Benchmarking of Large Design–Build Highway Projects

    Shrestha, Pramen Prasad / Migliaccio, Giovanni Ciro / O'Connor, James T. et al. | Transportation Research Record | 2007


    Benchmarking processes for managing large international space programs

    Mandell, Humboldt C., Jr. / Duke, Michael B. | NTRS | 1993