Electronic Evidence Tools can be presented at the hearing as valid evidence and have been regulated separately in the ITE Law. However, in the Civil Procedure Law the formal legality has not been regulated how to show. Formulation of the problems raised in this writing (1) How is the legal certainty of the Electronic Evidence in the Civil Procedure Code; (2) What is the ideal arrangement regarding Electronic Evidence Tools in Civil Procedure Code; The first discussion is that Article 5 Paragraph (1) and (2) of Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions (UU ITE) which only provides legal certainty to the extent of the recognition of the existence of Electronic Evidence Tools as valid evidence. There must be an ideal arrangement regarding the Electronic Evidence Tool in the Civil Procedure Code to ensure the legal certainty of the procedure for submission and enforcement is: first, with a mechanism for renewing the HIR and RBg. Second, the party that has the authority to stipulate a Circular of the Supreme Court on how the parties know and see the Electronic Evidence Tool and the procedure for submitting Electronic Evidence Tools. How to cite item: Maulidiyah, N., Satriana, Y. (2019). Eksistensi Digital Evidence dalam Hukum Acara Perdata. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 10(1), 69-76. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v10i1.2616


    Access

    Download


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Eksistensi Digital Evidence dalam Hukum Acara Perdata


    Contributors:


    Publication date :

    2019




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    Unknown





    Studi Komparatif Larangan Perkawinan Antara Hukum Adat, Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Islam

    Erni Djun’astuti / Muhammad Tahir / Marnita Marnita | DOAJ | 2022

    Free access

    Subjek Hukum dan Objek Hukum: Sebuah Tinjauan Hukum Islam, Pidana dan Perdata

    Doli Witro / Mhd. Rasidin / Muhamad Izazi Nurjaman | DOAJ | 2021

    Free access