In this study, three axial distances are proposed as alternatives to the existing axial distances of the Central Composite Design (CCD) in cuboidal design regions with the aim of providing formidable alternatives to the existing axial distances of the CCD whose prediction properties are less extreme and more stable in the cuboidal design regions. The three alternative axial distances, namely the arithmetic, harmonic and geometric axial distances for cuboidal regions, were developed algebraically based on the concepts of the three Pythagorean means. The strengths and weaknesses of the alternative axial distances were validated by comparing their performances with the existing axial distances in the cuboidal regions. The D- and G-efficiencies are used for comparison. The cuboidal region shows that the three alternative axial distances are consistently better in terms of the D- and G-efficiencies
Comparisons of Alternative Axial Distances for Cuboidal Regions of Central Composite Designs Using D and G Efficiencies
2019-12-18
MathLAB Journal; Vol. 4 (2019); 58-66 ; 2582-0389
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC: | 629 |
Construction of Alternative Axial Points Using Standard Axial Points of Central Composite Design
BASE | 2022
|Comparisons of Flexible Pavement Designs
Transportation Research Record | 2006
|Steam and diesel locomotives; relative thermal efficiencies and some comparisons
Engineering Index Backfile | 1961
|A STUDY ON THE EFFICIENCIES OF CARGO AIRPLANE DESIGNS
SAE Technical Papers | 1944
|Comparisons between the efficiencies of an American and an Austrian locomotive
Engineering Index Backfile | 1906
|