In this study, three axial distances are proposed as alternatives to the existing axial distances of the Central Composite Design (CCD) in cuboidal design regions with the aim of providing formidable alternatives to the existing axial distances of the CCD whose prediction properties are less extreme and more stable in the cuboidal design regions. The three alternative axial distances, namely the arithmetic, harmonic and geometric axial distances for cuboidal regions, were developed algebraically based on the concepts of the three Pythagorean means. The strengths and weaknesses of the alternative axial distances were validated by comparing their performances with the existing axial distances in the cuboidal regions. The D- and G-efficiencies are used for comparison. The cuboidal region shows that the three alternative axial distances are consistently better in terms of the D- and G-efficiencies


    Access

    Download


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Comparisons of Alternative Axial Distances for Cuboidal Regions of Central Composite Designs Using D and G Efficiencies


    Contributors:

    Publication date :

    2019-12-18


    Remarks:

    MathLAB Journal; Vol. 4 (2019); 58-66 ; 2582-0389


    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English



    Classification :

    DDC:    629



    Construction of Alternative Axial Points Using Standard Axial Points of Central Composite Design

    Ugbe, Thomas / Edet Bassey / Richmond Ofonodo et al. | BASE | 2022

    Free access

    Comparisons of Flexible Pavement Designs

    Carvalho, Regis L. / Schwartz, Charles W. | Transportation Research Record | 2006



    A STUDY ON THE EFFICIENCIES OF CARGO AIRPLANE DESIGNS

    Nebesar, Robert J. | SAE Technical Papers | 1944