Diffuse reflection with incomplete accommodation is the favored gas–surface interaction model for calculating the drag coefficient of satellites in low Earth orbit, where drag is the largest source of uncertainty in the orbital trajectory of satellites. Closed-form solutions have incorporated the variation of the energy accommodation coefficient through equating the total energy of the incident and reflected flows; however, this leads to an incorrect reflected velocity distribution for incomplete accommodation. The problem is highlighted by investigating the velocity distribution functions for a gas reflected from a flat plate at zero accommodation. A physically accurate implementation for diffuse reflection with incomplete accommodation based on the Cercignani–Lampis–Lord gas–surface interaction model is compared with the closed-form solutions that equate the incident and reflected energy of the flow. The Cercignani–Lampis–Lord gas–surface interaction model shows the conservation of energy on a molecule-by-molecule basis for zero accommodation, as expected, whereas the closed-form method only conserves energy on average. The macroscopic effect of the different velocity distributions manifests in differences of in the drag coefficient of a flat plate, sphere, and the GRACE satellite at zero accommodation and differences larger than 1% for energy accommodation coefficients less than 0.90.
Different Implementations of Diffuse Reflection with Incomplete Accommodation for Drag Coefficient Modeling
Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets ; 51 , 5 ; 1522-1532
2014-05-30
11 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Improved Satellite Drag Coefficient Calculations from Orbital Measurements of Energy Accommodation
Online Contents | 1998
|Classification with Diffuse or Incomplete Information
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2008
|Drag and energy accommodation coefficients during sunspot maximum
Online Contents | 2010
|Drag and energy accommodation coefficients during sunspot maximum
Elsevier | 2009
|