This chapter contains sections titled:
Some Examples of the Coupling‐Constitution Fallacy
Replies to the Coupling‐Constitution Fallacy
Conclusion
The Coupling‐Constitution Fallacy
The Bounds of Cognition ; 88-105
22.01.2010
18 pages
Aufsatz/Kapitel (Buch)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
“coupling‐extension fallacy” ‐ or “causation‐extension fallacy” , simple coupling argument, causal connection ‐ between cognizing organism and its environment , causation‐constitution distinction ‐ theoretical work for extended cognition , how the body shapes ‐ or influences what we think and what we think about , coupling‐constitution fallacy , causal connections between brain and environment ‐ causal loops constituting part of cognitive processes , Menary claiming, Otto's use of his notebook ‐ an extension of cognitive processing , tacit shift from hypothesis, something constitutes a cognitive system ‐ to hypothesis that it is an instance of extended cognition , localization of source of sound ‐ influencing cues humans use to localize sounds , moving from causal dependency claim ‐ to constitution/supervenience/embodiment claim
Engineering Index Backfile | 1963
|SAE Technical Papers | 1934
|The Fallacy of Supplier Certification
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1993
|Three-cent fare fallacy exposed
Engineering Index Backfile | 1896
Springer Verlag | 2015
|