Which is more reliable? A reconstruction based on sound physical facts, eyewitness statements, or both? Eyewitness statements are usually opinions stated as facts, easily misinterpreted, and often misleading. These historically vague summaries are severely limited for accident reconstruction or animation use. This paper reviews the reasons for witness communication difficulties and provides questioning techniques that will, in many instances, allow the investigator to extract data which is more consistent with physical facts and Newtonian physics. This more accurate witness data can be used for developing effective testimony, reconstruction and animation.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff prüfen

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen

    Bestellung bei Subito €


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Improving Witness Contributions to Reconstruction and Animation


    Weitere Titelangaben:

    Sae Technical Papers


    Beteiligte:

    Kongress:

    International Congress & Exposition ; 1992



    Erscheinungsdatum :

    1992-02-01




    Medientyp :

    Aufsatz (Konferenz)


    Format :

    Print


    Sprache :

    Englisch




    Improving witness contributions to reconstruction and animation

    Cox,L.D. / Rivers,G.W. / Burke,L. et al. | Kraftfahrwesen | 1992


    Stereoscopic Animation for Accident Reconstruction

    Roberts, David E. / Manning, Lindley / McLay, Richard W. | SAE Technical Papers | 1993


    Stereoscopic animation for accident reconstruction

    McLay,R.W. / Roberts,D.E. / Manning,L. et al. | Kraftfahrwesen | 1993


    Witness

    Online Contents | 1994


    REMOTE WITNESS SYSTEM AND REMOTE WITNESS METHOD

    MORINAGA TOSHIYA / OTA TADASHI / FUKUDA KAZUO et al. | Europäisches Patentamt | 2020

    Freier Zugriff