This paper deals with a comparison, on a common basis, between quiet, point design, turbofan, prop fan, and turboprop intercity STOL transports as a means of possible accelerating convergence toward a preferred system. Results indicate the high-speed turboprop aircraft is superior in terms of minimum gross weight, and, therefore superior in direct operating cost and ticket cost. It is probably also the safest of the three aircraft because of the greatest thrust margin and least thrust asymmetry during waveoff.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff prüfen

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen

    Bestellung bei Subito €


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Design Comparison of Quiet M=0.80 STOL Transports


    Weitere Titelangaben:

    Sae Technical Papers


    Beteiligte:
    Scherrer, Richard (Autor:in) / Olson, Robert (Autor:in)

    Kongress:

    National Aeronautical and Space Engineering and Manufacturing Meeting ; 1971



    Erscheinungsdatum :

    01.02.1971




    Medientyp :

    Aufsatz (Konferenz)


    Format :

    Print


    Sprache :

    Englisch


    Schlagwörter :


    STOL commercial and business transports.

    Eaton, J. M. / Garrad, W. C. J. | NTRS | 1967


    Advanced Technology for STOL Transports

    Cornish, J. J. | SAE Technical Papers | 1971


    STOL Commercial and Business Transports

    Eaton, J. M. / Garrard, W. C. J. | SAE Technical Papers | 1967


    STOL commercial and business transports

    Garrard, W.C.J. / Eaton, J.M. | Engineering Index Backfile | 1967


    Design and operating considerations of commercial stol transports.

    Deckert, W. H. / Holzhauser, C. A. / Kelly, M. W. et al. | NTRS | 1965