As avionic systems become more complex, realistic qualification requirements for the flight-critical systems becomes more important, but more difficult to define. Requirements developed to establish acceptable levels of performance must be verifiable if they are to have any meaning. This article shows that both the current FAA requirements of flight-critical systems and the FAA recommended methods for probabilistic assessment are flawed, and result in "required" safety assessments which are misleading. Alternatives are then explored.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff prüfen

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen

    Bestellung bei Subito €


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    The realism of FAA reliability-safety requirements and alternatives


    Beteiligte:
    Pecht, M. (Autor:in) / Boullie, J. (Autor:in) / Hakim, E. (Autor:in) / Jain, A.K. (Autor:in) / Jackson, M. (Autor:in) / Knowles, I. (Autor:in) / Schroeder, R. (Autor:in) / Strange, A.D. (Autor:in)

    Erschienen in:

    Erscheinungsdatum :

    01.02.1998


    Format / Umfang :

    496734 byte




    Medientyp :

    Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)


    Format :

    Elektronische Ressource


    Sprache :

    Englisch