Highlights Comparison of performance of anticipatory versus traffic-responsive signal control. Anticipatory control outperforms traffic-responsive control. The first mover advantage and externalities make anticipatory control superior.

    Abstract Intuitively, one is inclined to think that traffic-responsive signal control is the most efficient control policy. In this paper, however, we show that for an intersection of two routes connecting one origin–destination pair where only one route is subject to congestion, anticipatory signal control performs better than traffic-responsive signal control. Furthermore, the unfolded logic behind this result suggests that the superiority of anticipatory signal control also extends to other networks.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff prüfen

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen

    Bestellung bei Subito €


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    The myth of traffic-responsive signal control: Why common sense does not always make sense


    Beteiligte:
    Evers, Ruth (Autor:in) / Proost, Stef (Autor:in)


    Erscheinungsdatum :

    2015-05-04


    Format / Umfang :

    8 pages




    Medientyp :

    Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)


    Format :

    Elektronische Ressource


    Sprache :

    Englisch




    Does vertical separation always make sense?

    Drew, Jeremy / Nash, Chri | IuD Bahn | 2011


    Does OpenOffice.org make sense for business?

    British Library Online Contents | 2008



    It's common sense

    Online Contents | 2005


    It's common sense

    Online Contents | 2004