Several technologies have been developed for optimizing the use of electric vehicles, especially with regard to replenishment of the energy supply. A novel model with which to compare the implementation cost of various replenishment technologies is proposed. Petri nets were used to calculate the minimum amount of resources required to implement each of the solutions given a specific headway. Three case studies are presented, the results of which led to the conclusion that on shorter headways, battery swap systems are preferred, followed by in-motion grid-provided systems, and that on longer headways, battery recharge systems are preferred for total implementation cost. The in-motion grid-provided systems showed a lower overall operation cost over the headway range; this result indicates a potentially lower overall implementation cost if the complete life-cycle cost is taken into account.


    Access

    Download

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Implementation Cost Comparison of Electric Vehicle Energy Replenishment Technologies for Public Transit Bus Systems


    Additional title:

    Transportation Research Record


    Contributors:


    Publication date :

    2013-01-01




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English




    ENERGY REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM AND ENERGY REPLENISHMENT METHOD FOR VEHICLE, AND VEHICLE

    CHE XIANDA / ZHU XUEWU / LIU YUANZHI et al. | European Patent Office | 2024

    Free access

    VEHICLE ENERGY REPLENISHMENT SECTION

    OKINO MASAHIRO | European Patent Office | 2023

    Free access

    VEHICLE REPLENISHMENT

    POUNDS PAUL E I | European Patent Office | 2017

    Free access

    Vehicle replenishment

    POUNDS PAUL E I | European Patent Office | 2017

    Free access