This work looks at two different Design of Experiments methods for defining an operating window in the sheet metal stamping process. The first involves the use of replicates at the different experimental points while the second is a nonreplicated method. The two methods are compared by looking at the relationship results produced and the indication of variation in the process. It is found that the results from both methods are very similar. However the replicated method provides a greater level of confidence in the results. In the stamping process where performing large numbers of replicates is expensive in both time and money the nonreplicated method provides a cost effective way of understanding the process.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Identifying variation in sheet metal stamping


    Contributors:


    Publication date :

    1999


    Size :

    8 Seiten, 5 Bilder, 3 Tabellen, 5 Quellen



    Type of media :

    Conference paper


    Type of material :

    Print


    Language :

    English




    Development of FEM for Sheet Metal Stamping

    Nakamachi, Eiji / Wagoner, Robert H. | SAE Technical Papers | 1988


    Drawbeads in Sheet Metal Stamping - A Review

    Weinmann, K. J. / Bohn, M. L. / Xu, S. G. | SAE Technical Papers | 1997


    Drawbeads in Sheet Metal Stamping - A Review

    Xu, S. G. / Bohn, M. L. / Weinmann, K. J. et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996


    Drawbeads in sheet metal stamping - a review

    Xu,S.G. / Bohn,M.L. / Weinmann,K.J. et al. | Automotive engineering | 1997


    Development of FEM for sheet metal stamping

    Nakamachi,E. / Wagoner,R.H. / Ohio State Univ.,US | Automotive engineering | 1988