The ongoing process of port reform has led to an increasing number of publicly owned but corporatised port authorities (PAs). The performance effects of corporatisation have been analysed, for example, for the airports industry, often showing positive effects. This paper reviews the literature on port reform and the relationship between port governance structures and performance. It also presents a first case study on the effects of corporatisation of PAs, namely for the Port of Rotterdam Authority, a publicly owned but corporatised port development company. In 2004, this organisation was transformed from a municipal department to an independently operating company. The performance indicators to evaluate the effect of this corporatisation include market share, turnover, operating costs, profits, and investments. These indicators are evaluated for two periods, one prior to the corporatisation (1997–2003) and the other afterwards (2005–11). The comparison of these two periods shows that corporatisation has led to significant improvements of all performance indicators. The findings derived from this case study are relevant for the ongoing discussion on port governance models.
Corporatisation and Performance: A Literature Review and an Analysis of the Performance Effects of the Corporatisation of Port of Rotterdam Authority
Transport Reviews ; 34 , 3 ; 396-414
2014-05-04
19 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
REGULARS - NEWS REVIEW - Indian ports corporatisation date set
Online Contents | 1999
Corporate strategy: Corporatisation is recommended for Australian port authorities
Online Contents | 1993
Ready for Corporatisation: PSA Reorganizes Structure
British Library Online Contents | 1997
Reasons to restructure - Privatisation, corporatisation and competition hit Australian rail
Online Contents | 1997