Although counteracting environmental programmes and policies have been strengthened, large oil spills still occur at irregular intervals. The total oil spill costs and their compensations have attracted much interest from various parties, such as local stakeholders, and state and federal governments. This paper addresses five major cost categories whose aggregations are expected to cover the overall direct and indirect costs after the release of an oil spill. Among them, research costs should not be neglected, since they tend to be high if public attention has been drawn to the case. Through an examination of the relationship between the total oil spill costs and their admissible claims, we found that:
admissible claims do not cover the overall costs of the oil spill, and
admissible claims cannot be compensated in full in the case of large spills.
Clearly, a sound oil spill contingency management aims to minimize both the environmental impacts of areas most at risk and the total oil spill costs. In this paper an economic model for measuring environmental damages following an oil spill is addressed and applied to the Prestige case which happened to be the worst oil pollution in the history of Spain. The model indicates how an ideally a priori economic evaluation may intuitively help managers to make informed as well as fast decisions in contingency cases.Total oil spill costs and compensations
Maritime Policy & Management ; 33 , 1 ; 49-60
2006-02-01
12 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Total oil spill costs and compensations
Online Contents | 2006
|DÉFENSE - Compensations F-16 pour le Chili
Online Contents | 2002
Ultralong Lightwave Systems with Incomplete Dispersion Compensations
British Library Online Contents | 2001
|Neural Compensations after Lesion of the Cerebral Cortex
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2001
|Heroic Compensations: The Benign Face of the Human Factor
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2003
|