Abstract In cooperative automated driving, the task of lateral and longitudinal vehicle control can be shared by driver and automation. However, conflicting action intentions of the two partners could arise, which need to be resolved within limited time. This can be achieved through structured multimodal negotiation, called arbitration. In order to explore intuitive interaction patterns for arbitration situations, insights from human-human interaction might be transferred. Accordingly, in a field study, couples holding hands or walking arm in arm were videotaped and interviewed when a conflict concerning motion control has been observed. The analysis of the data shows that conflict situations concerning velocity and/or direction of movement occur in natural human-human interaction and that these types of conflict can be dependent on each other. Furthermore, partners use different interaction resources to successfully solve these situations. Results are transferred to cooperative automated driving and an example of an interaction pattern is presented.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Cooperative Safety Based on Naturalistic Driving Data

    Li, Yingfeng “Eric” / Gibbons, Ronald B. / Kim, Bumsik | ASCE | 2022


    Learning From Naturalistic Driving Data for Human-Like Autonomous Highway Driving

    Xu, Donghao / Ding, Zhezhang / He, Xu et al. | IEEE | 2021


    Cluster Naturalistic Driving Encounters Using Deep Unsupervised Learning

    Li, Sisi / Wang, Wenshuo / Mo, Zhaobin et al. | IEEE | 2018


    Driving Style Clustering using Naturalistic Driving Data

    Chen, Kuan-Ting / Chen, Huei-Yen Winnie | Transportation Research Record | 2019


    Analysis of Naturalistic Driving Data

    Shankar, Venky / Jovanis, Paul P. / Aguero-Valverde, Jonathan et al. | Transportation Research Record | 2008