A study of the crank and gear-train dynamics of a two-stroke opposed piston diesel engine design uncovered a disconnect between the thermodynamic process and its conversion to mechanical work. The classic two-stroke opposed piston design phases the intake piston to lag the exhaust piston in order to achieve favorable gas exchange, overcoming the disadvantage of piston-controlled ports. One result of this is that significantly more of the engine torque is delivered by the leading crank than from the trailing one. This paper will examine why this torque difference occurs showing that it is not simply a proportioning of the available thermodynamic work but a result of a fundamental mechanical loss mechanism that limits the achievable brake efficiency of this engine architecture. This analysis will provide a basis for developing effective design solutions to overcome the mechanical loss by providing an understanding of this loss mechanism.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Understanding Limits to the Mechanical Efficiency of Opposed Piston Engines


    Additional title:

    Sae Technical Papers


    Contributors:

    Conference:

    WCX™ 17: SAE World Congress Experience ; 2017



    Publication date :

    2017-03-28




    Type of media :

    Conference paper


    Type of material :

    Print


    Language :

    English




    Opposed-piston oil engines

    Waring-Brown, R. | Engineering Index Backfile | 1957


    Fairbanks, morse opposed-piston engines

    Engineering Index Backfile | 1945


    Double-acting opposed piston engines

    Engineering Index Backfile | 1941


    Liner wear in opposed-piston engines

    Righton, A.A. | Engineering Index Backfile | 1944


    Thermodynamic Benefits of Opposed-Piston Two-Stroke Engines

    Foster, David E. / Regner, Gerhard / Lemke, James U. et al. | SAE Technical Papers | 2011