Background: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Exploration Atmospheres study (EA) was done to evaluate alternative cabin atmospheres for future spacecraft designs and planetary surface exploration of the Moon, Mars and beyond. Deep space exploration involves creating habitats and environments safe for human occupancy and means to explore the outside environment (extravehicular activities, EVA). In order to validate alternative atmospheres and pre-spacewalk procedures, the EA study was conducted to evaluate factors such as hypoxia risks, denitrogenation protocols, food limitations, medications, and the impact of other factors on human performance. Overview: Space travel is constrained by mass, volume, power and the cost of vehicle development, which creates tradeoffs in various capabilities, including breathing gasses. Higher atmospheric pressure in a vehicle means more gas, and a stronger containment vessel/habitat; while lower pressure requires higher oxygen partial pressure, which may increase fire risk. NASA’s EA study evaluated a proposed alternative cabin environment (8.2 psia, 34% Oxygen), for future spacecraft habitat, and planetary EVAs. EA included both a 3-day and a 11-day trial. These trials included a depressurization and saturation to 8.2psi at 34% O2 with additional depresses to 4.3 psia at 85% O2 for simulated EVAs, (1 EVA during the 3-day and 5 during the 11-day trials). Discussion: Planning for and executing the medical monitoring and response plan for a trial of this scope was a huge undertaking with no prior practice to fall back on. Food obstacles, sleeping issues, medications, joint injury, equipment limitations, medical privacy, multiple cases of decompression sickness, and even a COVID outbreak among the support team proved challenging. Conclusion: Testing of this nature is an essential part NASA’s preparation for the upcoming Lunar Artemis missions. As spaceflight transitions beyond low earth orbit, to planetary, even more trials of this nature will be required to learn what are the optimal atmospheric and associated operational constraints to maintain the optimal health of the crew and achieve mission objectives.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Medical Lessons Learned from the Exploration Atmospheres Study


    Contributors:
    R Sanders (author) / K Ray (author) / J Law (author) / D Reyes (author)

    Conference:

    2023 Aerospace Medical Association Conference ; 2023 ; New Orleans, LA, US


    Type of media :

    Miscellaneous


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English





    Open Atmospheres Forum: Exploration Atmospheres Validation Study

    Alejandro Garbino / Andrew Frank Abercromby / Patrick Neil Estep et al. | NTRS


    Constellation Operations - Lessons Learned for Future Exploration

    Kelly, Angelita / Case, Warren | AIAA | 2006


    Constellation Operations: Lessons Learned For Future Exploration

    Kelly, Angelita C. / Case, Warren F. | NTRS | 2006


    NASA Crew Exploration Vehicle, Thermal Protection System, Lessons Learned

    Venkatapathy, Ethiraj / Reuther, James | NTRS | 2008